Geographical mistake invalidates non-compete clause: Supreme Court of Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled that not using the legal name of a geographic area in a non-compete clause invalidates the clause.
-
Categories
- Advertising & marketing
- Agreements
- Alcoholic beverages
- Announcements
- Branding
- Cigarettes & tobacco
- Clothing
- Consumer product regulation
- Copyright
- Domain names
- Fabrics & textiles
- Fraud
- General
- Geographical indications
- Industrial designs
- International
- Internet
- Jewellery
- Licensing
- Litigation
- Non-traditional marks
- Official Marks
- Oppositions
- Packaging & labelling
- Patents
- Product liability
- Regulatory consultation
- Section 45 proceedings
- Summary cancellation proceedings
- Trade-marks
- Transactions
- UDRP
- Uncategorized
Stay connected on Twitter (@lorrainefleck)
- IP Address Blog Updates for May 28, 2012 wp.me/piqLs-md 14 hours ago
- Microsoft Hounds Google for Piracy Takedowns, but Some Bing Results Remain ti.me/LJR7nb 15 hours ago
- French Data Regulator Chides Google nyti.ms/MRGLky 15 hours ago
- Brewers Could Satisfy Thirst for Steady Returns on.wsj.com/MREHci 15 hours ago
- Interesting article on the underseas cables that connect the Internet on.wsj.com/LJO6Dn 1 day ago
Blogroll & Links
- Advertising Age
- Art and Artifice
- Bevlog Blog
- Brand New Day
- Fashionista-at-Law Blog
- Hoffer Adler LLP
- Intelligent Franchising
- Intelligent IP Law
- Intelligent Litigating
- Intelligent Tax Law
- Interbrand Blog
- International Trademark Association (INTA)
- IP Finance Blog
- IP Osgoode
- IP Tango Blog
- IP Think Tank
- IPKat Blog
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice Blog
- Marketing Magazine
- Marques' Class 46 Blog
- MaRS Blog
- Namesmash
- New York Times' Technology News
- RehanKhalil.com
- The 1709 Blog
- The Huffington Post – Technology
- Typography for Lawyers
